Why can I access a derived private member function via a base class pointer to a derived object?

By : Bruce
Source: Stackoverflow.com

using namespace std;
class base
    virtual void add() {
        cout << "hi";

class derived : public base
    void add() {
        cout << "bye";

int main()
    base *ptr;
    ptr = new derived;
    return 0;

Output is bye

I dont have a problem with how this is implemented. I understand you use vtables and the vtable of derived contains the address of the new add() function. But add() is private shouldn't compiler generate an error when I try to access it outside the class? Somehow it doesn't seem right.

By : Bruce


To add a little to Georg's answer:

Remember that the compiler has no control over and cannot guarantee anything about derived classes. For example, I could ship my type in a library and derive from it in an entirely new program. How is the library compiler supposed to know that derived might have a different access specifier? The derived type didn't exist when the library was compiled.

In order to support this, the compiler would have to know access specifiers at runtime and throw an exception if you attempted to access a private member.

By : Puppy

Access modifiers, such as public, private and protected are only enforced during compilation. When you call the function through a pointer to the base class, the compiler doesn't know that the pointer points to an instance of the derived class. According to the rules the compiler can infer from this expression, this call is valid.

It is usually a semantic error to reduce the visibility of a member in a derived class. Modern programming languages such as Java and C# refuse to compile such code, because a member that is visible in the base class is always accessible in the derived class through a base pointer.

By : Hosam Aly

This video can help you solving your question :)
By: admin