Is there any way to determine the size of a C++ array programmatically? And if not, why?

By : Kip

This question was inspired by a similar question: How does delete[] “know” the size of the operand array?

My question is a little different: Is there any way to determine the size of a C++ array programmatically? And if not, why? Every function I've seen that takes an array also requires an integer parameter to give it the size. But as the linked question pointed out, delete[] must know the size of the memory to be deallocated.

Consider this C++ code:

int* arr = new int[256];
printf("Size of arr: %d\n", sizeof(arr));

This prints "Size of arr: 4", which is just the size of the pointer. It would be nice to have some function which prints 256, but I don't think one exists in C++. (Again, part of the question is why it doesn't exist.)

Clarification: I know that if I declared the array on the stack instead of the heap (i.e. "int arr[256];") that the sizeof operator would return 1024 (array length * sizeof(int)).

By : Kip


Some magic:

template <typename T, size_t S>
size_t array_size(const T (&v)[S]) 
    return S; 

And this is how we do it in C++11:

template<typename T, size_t S>
auto array_size(const T (&)[S]) -> size_t
    return S; 
By : Zingam

delete [] does know the size that was allocated. However, that knowledge resides in the runtime or in the operating system's memory manager, meaning that it is not available to the compiler during compilation. And sizeof() is not a real function, it is actually evaluated to a constant by the compiler, which is something it cannot do for dynamically allocated arrays, whose size is not known during compilation.

Also, consider this example:

int *arr = new int[256];
int *p = &arr[100];
printf("Size: %d\n", sizeof(p));

How would the compiler know what the size of p is? The root of the problem is that arrays in C and C++ are not first-class objects. They decay to pointers, and there is no way for the compiler or the program itself to know whether a pointer points to the beginning of a chunk of memory allocated by new, or to a single object, or to some place in the middle of a chunk of memory allocated by new.

One reason for this is that C and C++ leave memory management to the programmer and to the operating system, which is also why they do not have garbage collection. Implementation of new and delete is not part of the C++ standard, because C++ is meant to be used on a variety of platforms, which may manage their memory in very different ways. It may be possible to let C++ keep track of all the allocated arrays and their sizes if you are writing a word processor for a windows box running on the latest Intel CPU, but it may be completely infeasible when you are writing an embedded system running on a DSP.

By : Dima

the way I do that is by dividing the size of the array by the size of the first element

int intarray[100];
printf ("Size of the array %d\n", (sizeof(intarray) / sizeof(intarray[0]));

It prints 100

This video can help you solving your question :)
By: admin